[POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
Moderator: Executive
[POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
So, this past scrim we experimented with 80% and 90% HP settings, on the EU and NA server respectively. We'd like to know your thoughts.
For me personally, I enjoyed 80% more. It seemed like a nice medium between the insanity that is hardcore and 100% play. While playing 90% I really didn't notice it whatsoever. That said I support whatever everyone else wants, and thus don't really care all that much.
That said, the HUD bug with reporting HP (showing 126 or 112 or whatever) makes using the settings off-putting to me, and I'm not sure that lowering HP is actually worth it with TTK being lower overall in BF4 than in BF3.
Poll is up, please choose your favorite (or "I don't care" option).
For me personally, I enjoyed 80% more. It seemed like a nice medium between the insanity that is hardcore and 100% play. While playing 90% I really didn't notice it whatsoever. That said I support whatever everyone else wants, and thus don't really care all that much.
That said, the HUD bug with reporting HP (showing 126 or 112 or whatever) makes using the settings off-putting to me, and I'm not sure that lowering HP is actually worth it with TTK being lower overall in BF4 than in BF3.
Poll is up, please choose your favorite (or "I don't care" option).
woke up this morning, put on my slippers, walked in the kitchen and died
- Necromancer
- Supporting Member
- Posts: 3315
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
I'd like to see how a 120HP feels like.
I'd love to have response time.
I'd love to have response time.
-“Regret your helplessness…and feel despair.”
Achievement Unlocked: Battlefield 4 Uninstalled!!
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
if we do this can we make it mandatory that both armies AAR's contain the server settings used on each map and round while we experiment. Because i don't remember what health we had on what maps, would make it easier to give feedback.
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
80% or 100% is not so different i think. i put 80% so i can snipe without dying every time i get in a 1v1 >.<
with 80% bolt actions might be a problem because of the easy one hit kills with bodyshots, but snipers are borderline useless in BF4 anyway because of all the screen shake from explosives and vehicles so i dont think a boost to them will be gamebreaking.
agree with necro about 120%, we should test that.
with 80% bolt actions might be a problem because of the easy one hit kills with bodyshots, but snipers are borderline useless in BF4 anyway because of all the screen shake from explosives and vehicles so i dont think a boost to them will be gamebreaking.
agree with necro about 120%, we should test that.
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
viewtopic.php?f=451&t=24134Ishimel wrote:if we do this can we make it mandatory that both armies AAR's contain the server settings used on each map and round while we experiment. Because i don't remember what health we had on what maps, would make it easier to give feedback.
BF2: C5 - Corporal | C6 - Corporal | C7 - Feldwebel (Sergeant) | C8 - Neutral Peace Keeper | C9 - Captain | C10 - Grand Moff (HC) | C11 - Macaca (Staff Sergeant) | C12 - Major | C13 - Corporal
BF3: C1 - Colonel | C2 - General | C3 - Neutral | C4 - Brigadier | C5 - Private | C6 - Brigadier General
BF4: C1 - Tournament Admin | C2 - General
BF3: C1 - Colonel | C2 - General | C3 - Neutral | C4 - Brigadier | C5 - Private | C6 - Brigadier General
BF4: C1 - Tournament Admin | C2 - General
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
I didn't really notice much of a difference - I die a ton regardless
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
Would prefer 100% here.
Battlefield Tournament History
BF3C4: STAR Infantry Private 2
BF3C5: LOD Infantry Private
BF3C6: UNSC Infantry Private First Class
BF4C1: USSR Infantry Conscript
BF4C2: GoCI Infantry Private First Class
BF4C3: LN7 Infantry Private
BF4C4: JANUS Armor Private
BF4C5: KTSS SAS Captain
BF4C6: SAD Infantry Corporal
BF4C7: GC Infantry Captain
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
I'm assuming it also affects survivability from vehicle weapons.
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
80% feels like GC and as described by matsif in the OP.
It also adds balance to different guns/classes.
It also adds balance to different guns/classes.
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
I liked 80% a lot for bf3 GC, I felt like it really added something.
However with bf4 it just feels like I die wayy to fast on 80%, that and it makes DMR's better, which means I have to hear that annoying sound even more
So I vote 100%
However with bf4 it just feels like I die wayy to fast on 80%, that and it makes DMR's better, which means I have to hear that annoying sound even more
So I vote 100%
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
80%-100% don't feel that different to me, but 60% is a but low.
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
80% and 90% have been giving us the weird bug where we still spawn in with "100" but can only be healed up to a maximum of our 80/90. That's where the 124%etc HP was coming from. It's interesting that it does that and slightly effects the way someone plays, but it also makes it hard to determine what will kill an enemy.
As it is, TTK in BF4 is a lot lower than BF3. I don't see why we need to lower health this time around. Given that the revive functionaility is nowhere near as useful as it was in BF3, I don't think health is a factor that needs diddled around with.
As it is, TTK in BF4 is a lot lower than BF3. I don't see why we need to lower health this time around. Given that the revive functionaility is nowhere near as useful as it was in BF3, I don't think health is a factor that needs diddled around with.
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
Coming into it i was a big advocate for 80% play, given thats what we had in bf3
having seen it in bf4 though, yeah, 100% is just fine by me
fully auto 34-22 and above damage models are accessible by every class now which is different
80% felt closer to counter strike than bf, whoever was better at knowing what corners existed and when to check them just flat out wins
having seen it in bf4 though, yeah, 100% is just fine by me
fully auto 34-22 and above damage models are accessible by every class now which is different
80% felt closer to counter strike than bf, whoever was better at knowing what corners existed and when to check them just flat out wins
- Divine-Sneaker
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:26 pm
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
100%, 100%.
Dice keeps heightening the damage models while the opposite is what needs to happen.
Dice keeps heightening the damage models while the opposite is what needs to happen.
"fraking game mechanics"
Re: [POLL]How did you feel about health settings?
80% in BF4 feels like 60% in BF3.
This punishes the team that needs to push a flag way too hard.
I voted 90% to comfort the 'more hardcore players'. I'd rather have 100% than 80% though.
This punishes the team that needs to push a flag way too hard.
I voted 90% to comfort the 'more hardcore players'. I'd rather have 100% than 80% though.
Wat ne Wuchtbrumme!