BattleBlog #11

[.Sup]

My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.

If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?

Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.

[styphon]

My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.

If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?

Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.

What he's saying sup, is if we run rush but have 2 servers running at once. That gives you 2 servers of 32, for 64 players. It's not a bad idea IMO. May need testing to see whether it's feasible, and may only be possible in the middle of battle days when we would be looking at switching servers.

[.Sup]

My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.

If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?

Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.

What he's saying sup, is if we run rush but have 2 servers running at once. That gives you 2 servers of 32, for 64 players. It's not a bad idea IMO. May need testing to see whether it's feasible, and may only be possible in the middle of battle days when we would be looking at switching servers.

I see. But that would mean I wouldn't get to kill Brummie 10 times in a row. I really wan't diversity and playing with people around the globe not just with EU players.

[styphon]

Agree, but if it extends the map pool I think it's an idea worth exploring. Not a perfect solution but we need to do the best we can with the tools we're given.

[WoodenPlank]

Agree, but if it extends the map pool I think it's an idea worth exploring. Not a perfect solution but we need to do the best we can with the tools we're given.

Exactly. I really like the idea of using it mid-battle as part of the switch from NA to EU.

[.Sup]

Agree, but if it extends the map pool I think it's an idea worth exploring. Not a perfect solution but we need to do the best we can with the tools we're given.

I understand it could be an option for some but not for me. Maps or fiends? I much rather have only map at disposal than not play with the NA guys.

[sushi]

GC is the idea of one big community playing altogether - so for the main battleday event the idea of having separate battles simultaneously does not do the trick.

[BRUMMIE]

I see. But that would mean I wouldn't get to kill Brummie 10 times in a row. I really wan't diversity and playing with people around the globe not just with EU players.

Exactely, and I insist that I only be allowed to die 10 times in a row if it is by .Sup. Non one else is allowed to do that ok

[Robawillis]

Damn brummie i guess after 10 times I must play only with a knife, one handed, with an eye closed if I see you on the battlefield

[styphon]

Damn brummie i guess after 10 times I must play only with a knife, one handed, with an eye closed if I see you on the battlefield

Rob! Now that's a little harsh! Poor Brummie. He may be old and half blind but there's no need for that

[Winter_Lion]

My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.

If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?

Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.

What he's saying sup, is if we run rush but have 2 servers running at once. That gives you 2 servers of 32, for 64 players. It's not a bad idea IMO. May need testing to see whether it's feasible, and may only be possible in the middle of battle days when we would be looking at switching servers.

We have done that in the past. We have even switched servers, between maps. Made it more fair lag issues wise as well.

[StarLord]

If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.

Let's not reinvente GC...

[.Sup]

If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.

Let's not reinvente GC...

I was hoping to always play Conquest except for EUBOs/NABOs if those will be played. Rush/Conquest would be in order then.

[StarLord]

If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.

Let's not reinvente GC...

I was hoping to always play Conquest except for EUBOs/NABOs if those will be played. Rush/Conquest would be in order then.

Yes but only if we have less than 32 players online

[.Sup]

If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.

Let's not reinvente GC...

I was hoping to always play Conquest except for EUBOs/NABOs if those will be played. Rush/Conquest would be in order then.

Yes but only if we have less than 32 players online

You mean for EUBOs/NABOs?