Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Discuss the campaign and all things BF.

Moderator: Executive

BRUMMIE
Senator
Senator
Posts: 2293
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm

Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by BRUMMIE »

Good News! We have setup your server instantly!
Details of your server are below:
Game: Battlefield 3
Server Name:Multiplay::Global-Conflict
Server IP: 206.217.128.34:19567
Join Address:
Ash2Dust
Executive
Executive
Posts: 4797
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: California

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Ash2Dust »

Thx Brummie. Do you know the data center location?
BRUMMIE
Senator
Senator
Posts: 2293
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by BRUMMIE »

new york, new york. Virginia wasn't available.
WoodenPlank
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: Northwest Florida

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by WoodenPlank »

Oh thank God.

NYC > Netherlands.
Ash2Dust
Executive
Executive
Posts: 4797
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: California

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Ash2Dust »

Reminder to everyone.
When you play with a good pubbie in your squad, tab out to add them as a friend in Battlelog.
That helps advertise GC to them everytime you are on our servers.
User avatar
Cheesy
Executive
Executive
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Cheesy »

And it's already full, nice!
Image
WoodenPlank
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: Northwest Florida

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by WoodenPlank »

Cheesy wrote:And it's already full, nice!
Yep, and B2K maps are still unplayable for me, even on the NA server.

:cry:
Ash2Dust
Executive
Executive
Posts: 4797
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: California

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Ash2Dust »

I have a quadcore I5-760 and it seems to have issues with 48+ players in B2K. Playable, but alot more stutter.
Could be my 4 GB memory as its maxing out and battlelog is starting to whore memory.
WoodenPlank
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: Northwest Florida

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by WoodenPlank »

Ash2Dust wrote:I have a quadcore I5-760 and it seems to have issues with 48+ players in B2K. Playable, but alot more stutter.
Could be my 4 GB memory as its maxing out and battlelog is starting to whore memory.
This game has so many coding issues that it's pathetic. The "enhanced destruction" is obviously a big part of the problem, at least with B2K. Dice put too much of the graphics load on the CPU.
Ferrit
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:09 am

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Ferrit »

WoodenPlank wrote:
Ash2Dust wrote:I have a quadcore I5-760 and it seems to have issues with 48+ players in B2K. Playable, but alot more stutter.
Could be my 4 GB memory as its maxing out and battlelog is starting to whore memory.
This game has so many coding issues that it's pathetic. The "enhanced destruction" is obviously a big part of the problem, at least with B2K. Dice put too much of the graphics load on the CPU.
Not being funny but,

It's 2011 almost 2012, Do you realy expect developers to make games that run well on older pc's?

you would not buy a car from the 50's and complain it has no aircon/cruise control/power steering.

YOUR computer aint upto the job it's a simple as that.

My machine runs it fine, I get a little stutter occasionaly with 50+ players on karkand only.

Phenom x 3 @ 2.6G
GTX 550TI
6G Ram
I run it fine.

Ranting the coding is shite when most other people on a reasonable machine run it fine is waisting your breath..

Upgrade it's that simple.

/endrant
Ash2Dust
Executive
Executive
Posts: 4797
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: California

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Ash2Dust »

I have a simple quad core, and I'm feeling I need to upgrade to a better one.
Prolly wont as I cant upgrade every year.
madcow
Executive
Executive
Posts: 3561
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by madcow »

Ash2Dust wrote:I have a simple quad core, and I'm feeling I need to upgrade to a better one.
Prolly wont as I cant upgrade every year.
I have an almost 5 year old quad core processor (Q6600) and it runs BF3 just fine.
Image
Clicky to become a Voteable member.

“…so realistic, it'll have you picking shrapnel out of your backside.”
Ash2Dust
Executive
Executive
Posts: 4797
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: California

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Ash2Dust »

BF3 when it runs is decent. With B2K, I'm feeling a strain on my quad around 50 players. Vanilla seems fine at 64.
User avatar
Cheesy
Executive
Executive
Posts: 4168
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by Cheesy »

The hamster in my computer wheel NEEDS MORE AIR
Image
.Sup
Executive
Executive
Posts: 6215
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: Slovenia, EU

Re: Global-Conflict has a new NA server

Post by .Sup »

Ash2Dust wrote:I have a quadcore I5-760 and it seems to have issues with 48+ players in B2K. Playable, but alot more stutter.
Could be my 4 GB memory as its maxing out and battlelog is starting to whore memory.
Why don't you close battlelog after the game has been loaded? I always do that and save about 200~300MB of ram. + there are less high ping spikes

madcow wrote:
Ash2Dust wrote:I have a simple quad core, and I'm feeling I need to upgrade to a better one.
Prolly wont as I cant upgrade every year.
I have an almost 5 year old quad core processor (Q6600) and it runs BF3 just fine.
newbs don't notice the lag :P
Image
Post Reply