Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.WoodenPlank wrote:My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.
If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?
BattleBlog #11
Moderator: Executive
Re: BattleBlog #11
Re: BattleBlog #11
What he's saying sup, is if we run rush but have 2 servers running at once. That gives you 2 servers of 32, for 64 players. It's not a bad idea IMO. May need testing to see whether it's feasible, and may only be possible in the middle of battle days when we would be looking at switching servers..Sup wrote:Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.WoodenPlank wrote:My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.
If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?
Re: BattleBlog #11
I see. But that would mean I wouldn't get to kill Brummie 10 times in a row. I really wan't diversity and playing with people around the globe not just with EU players.styphon wrote:What he's saying sup, is if we run rush but have 2 servers running at once. That gives you 2 servers of 32, for 64 players. It's not a bad idea IMO. May need testing to see whether it's feasible, and may only be possible in the middle of battle days when we would be looking at switching servers..Sup wrote:Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.WoodenPlank wrote:My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.
If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?
Re: BattleBlog #11
Agree, but if it extends the map pool I think it's an idea worth exploring. Not a perfect solution but we need to do the best we can with the tools we're given.
-
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
- Location: Northwest Florida
Re: BattleBlog #11
Exactly. I really like the idea of using it mid-battle as part of the switch from NA to EU.styphon wrote:Agree, but if it extends the map pool I think it's an idea worth exploring. Not a perfect solution but we need to do the best we can with the tools we're given.
Hoo hoo, Robin, I invented black-hawk whoring!
Re: BattleBlog #11
I understand it could be an option for some but not for me. Maps or fiends? I much rather have only map at disposal than not play with the NA guys.styphon wrote:Agree, but if it extends the map pool I think it's an idea worth exploring. Not a perfect solution but we need to do the best we can with the tools we're given.
Re: BattleBlog #11
GC is the idea of one big community playing altogether - so for the main battleday event the idea of having separate battles simultaneously does not do the trick.
Re: BattleBlog #11
Exactely, and I insist that I only be allowed to die 10 times in a row if it is by .Sup. Non one else is allowed to do that ok.Sup wrote:I see. But that would mean I wouldn't get to kill Brummie 10 times in a row. I really wan't diversity and playing with people around the globe not just with EU players.
-
- Executive
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Re: BattleBlog #11
Damn brummie i guess after 10 times I must play only with a knife, one handed, with an eye closed if I see you on the battlefield
Re: BattleBlog #11
Rob! Now that's a little harsh! Poor Brummie. He may be old and half blind but there's no need for thatRobawillis wrote:Damn brummie i guess after 10 times I must play only with a knife, one handed, with an eye closed if I see you on the battlefield
-
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
- Location: Lake Conroe.....Texas
Re: BattleBlog #11
We have done that in the past. We have even switched servers, between maps. Made it more fair lag issues wise as well.styphon wrote:What he's saying sup, is if we run rush but have 2 servers running at once. That gives you 2 servers of 32, for 64 players. It's not a bad idea IMO. May need testing to see whether it's feasible, and may only be possible in the middle of battle days when we would be looking at switching servers..Sup wrote:Rush doesn't allow 64 players (32 max for RUSH mode). Only conquest does. Rush infantry would be fine for EUBOs/NABOs though.WoodenPlank wrote:My thought is to save Infantry only for BO battles only. Seems a lot more fitting (Isn't that how we played it in BF2 anyway) for the BO type battles. I think it would be a disaster for main battles.
If we have enough players, what about using Rush for main battles, but running two matches simultaneously - one EU and one NA?
Re: BattleBlog #11
If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.
Let's not reinvente GC...
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.
Let's not reinvente GC...
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result."
-Winston Churchill
-Winston Churchill
Re: BattleBlog #11
I was hoping to always play Conquest except for EUBOs/NABOs if those will be played. Rush/Conquest would be in order then.StarLord wrote:If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.
Let's not reinvente GC...
Re: BattleBlog #11
Yes but only if we have less than 32 players online.Sup wrote:I was hoping to always play Conquest except for EUBOs/NABOs if those will be played. Rush/Conquest would be in order then.StarLord wrote:If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.
Let's not reinvente GC...
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result."
-Winston Churchill
-Winston Churchill
Re: BattleBlog #11
You mean for EUBOs/NABOs?StarLord wrote:Yes but only if we have less than 32 players online.Sup wrote:I was hoping to always play Conquest except for EUBOs/NABOs if those will be played. Rush/Conquest would be in order then.StarLord wrote:If we have more than 32 players online,
NOTHING else than CONQUEST 64.
Let's not reinvente GC...