GC Tournament #4 - CONGRATS TO DIE GIWENNATOREN!
Moderator: Executive
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4!!!! Vote in Poll #2!!!
fingers, toes and ears crossed for 1st of June!!!!
i guess i will be able to make it.
i guess i will be able to make it.
Welcome Committee Member
What is GC? | Getting Started at GC | Campaign Sign-up Video | FAQ | Forum Netiquette
New Members do you need help?
Find me on TS or send me a PM
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4!!!! Vote in Poll #2!!!
Alright guys. A few announcements before the EU people get offline.
For Tournament #4 we will be having... RANDOMIZED TEAMS.
Since I'm going to be leaving the house and won't be back till midnight today, I'm gonna get the 3rd poll running.
3rd Poll: CONQUEST OR SQUAD RUSH? (Both will be 4v4 due to player count)
Also, don't forget to sign up in the new sign-up sheet (EVEN IF YOU SIGNED UP IN THE FIRST SHEET)!
Sign Up here!
For Tournament #4 we will be having... RANDOMIZED TEAMS.
Since I'm going to be leaving the house and won't be back till midnight today, I'm gonna get the 3rd poll running.
3rd Poll: CONQUEST OR SQUAD RUSH? (Both will be 4v4 due to player count)
Also, don't forget to sign up in the new sign-up sheet (EVEN IF YOU SIGNED UP IN THE FIRST SHEET)!
Sign Up here!
[/url]
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Nice going Haruky, I think a Conquest-style tournament would be very interesting. It would definitely reward cunning and spatially-aware players more than those who can take advantage of a head glitch spot or res train. Or maybe that's just the Firestorm Infantry-only in me that's nodding in agreement.
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
I voted rush but isnt conquest "normally" played 5v5?
That shouldnt be a problem with random teams right
That shouldnt be a problem with random teams right
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
I still vote CQ. Because rush is a noob game mode (feel the hate)
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Can someone explain how conquest would work? I'm not sure of the details, but I'm doubting it would be 4v4 Caspian 64i...
BF3 C2: KI - Sgt | C3: Pride - Sgt | C4: Gladius - Sgt | C5: KART - Col | C6: UNSC - Col
RS2:V C1: A1 - Ofc | C2: SLOTH - HC
RS2:V C1: A1 - Ofc | C2: SLOTH - HC
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Maps like damavand small. Bazaar small. Tehran small. Seine small. Metro. Epicentre small.BlackIce wrote:Can someone explain how conquest would work? I'm not sure of the details, but I'm doubting it would be 4v4 Caspian 64i...
Fast fluid gameplay. Not about holding flags.
But I'd rather do a random 8v8 than 4v4 if we are not doing 5v5
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
It's less flags! But yeah, I think 5 would be better.BlackIce wrote:Can someone explain how conquest would work? I'm not sure of the details, but I'm doubting it would be 4v4 Caspian 64i...
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
If it's fast and fluid, why not use Conquest Domination?Sao wrote:Fast fluid gameplay. Not about holding flags.
Also, out of curiosity, what are the arguments for 4v4, 5v5, and 8v8? Why choose one over the other?
BF3 C2: KI - Sgt | C3: Pride - Sgt | C4: Gladius - Sgt | C5: KART - Col | C6: UNSC - Col
RS2:V C1: A1 - Ofc | C2: SLOTH - HC
RS2:V C1: A1 - Ofc | C2: SLOTH - HC
- Necromancer
- Supporting Member
- Posts: 3315
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
8vs8!
battlefield was never meant for small numbers like in other games. that 5vs5 format probably came from CB, which probably based it on their other games that mostly do 5vs5 or 6vs6.
battlefield was never meant for small numbers like in other games. that 5vs5 format probably came from CB, which probably based it on their other games that mostly do 5vs5 or 6vs6.
-“Regret your helplessness…and feel despair.”
Achievement Unlocked: Battlefield 4 Uninstalled!!
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Squad rush is a gamemode in battlefield so i think it is made for small numbers. 5v5 is great fun to play aswell so i dont think we should move away from this as far as 8v8'sNecromancer wrote:8vs8!
battlefield was never meant for small numbers like in other games. that 5vs5 format probably came from CB, which probably based it on their other games that mostly do 5vs5 or 6vs6.
''Be polite, be efficient. Have a plan to kill everyone you meet.'' The sniper
BF3
C2: Staff Sergeant - Hitcorp
C3: 1st Lieutenant - Dark army
C4: 1st Lieutenant - Starfishers coffee initiative
C5: PFC - Legion of Doom
BF3
C2: Staff Sergeant - Hitcorp
C3: 1st Lieutenant - Dark army
C4: 1st Lieutenant - Starfishers coffee initiative
C5: PFC - Legion of Doom
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:10 am
- Location: Northeastern Bavaria, near Germany
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
I'd also like 5v5 if we go with CQ
Also, can teams be announced, like, a week in advance? It would give them some time to strategize. :)
Also, can teams be announced, like, a week in advance? It would give them some time to strategize. :)
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
I think it might be a good idea to consider time frames if we're going with CQ. I believe CQ matches typically take longer than SQR, and I also assume 4v4 will take longer than 5v5
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
I snuck online for just a second.
We will most definitely not be doing 8v8. Maybe in the future but that is not in the plans at the moment.
5v5 might be a possibility depending on how many people sign up for this tournament. If we can make enough teams with 5 people per team, then I'll throw that in if we do Conquest. Or maybe it can go to Poll #4...
Regarding timing, we might need to do a "demo" 5v5 conquest if needed. Or if someone can give us their personal experience with that, that'd be great too.
We will most definitely not be doing 8v8. Maybe in the future but that is not in the plans at the moment.
5v5 might be a possibility depending on how many people sign up for this tournament. If we can make enough teams with 5 people per team, then I'll throw that in if we do Conquest. Or maybe it can go to Poll #4...
Regarding timing, we might need to do a "demo" 5v5 conquest if needed. Or if someone can give us their personal experience with that, that'd be great too.
[/url]
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
I had some concerns about 5v5 earlier in this thread. The reasons that were given for it were: A) smaller squads (A team would either have to be split into squads of 2 and 3 (less squadplay and cohesion) or one guy would be alone (which I also see no benefit from)) and B) squad hopping (which is generally banned in GC, and offers no advantage apparent to me).haruky wrote: 5v5 might be a possibility depending on how many people sign up for this tournament. If we can make enough teams with 5 people per team, then I'll throw that in if we do Conquest. Or maybe it can go to Poll #4...
Regarding timing, we might need to do a "demo" 5v5 conquest if needed. Or if someone can give us their personal experience with that, that'd be great too.
BF3:
C2: [K22S] Kinetic Influence - Senior Operative
C3: [PI3d] PRIDe - Lieutenant
C4: [G1S] Gladius - Sergeant
C5: [KYT] Kitten Adventure Rainbow Time - Private 1st Class
C6: [SIP] International Monetary Fund - Private
BF4
C1: [AD] Allied Forces - Private
C2: [K22S] Kinetic Influence - Senior Operative
C3: [PI3d] PRIDe - Lieutenant
C4: [G1S] Gladius - Sergeant
C5: [KYT] Kitten Adventure Rainbow Time - Private 1st Class
C6: [SIP] International Monetary Fund - Private
BF4
C1: [AD] Allied Forces - Private