He hasn't offended anyone.He just wants to improve our community, more particularly GC campaign and campaign system,but for some reason, Senators and TAs think he is too aggressive to be a General. Don't you think it doesn't make any sense
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
Moderator: Executive
I'd be interested in the process and progress too. I guess it happens mostly on TS/PM and in the Executives forum so I don't know anything about it. The fact that it is not visible/discussed in public seems odd and I wish I could follow that.CognitoCon wrote:I'm not going to take sides here, but the general selection process, from what I can see on the development forums, seems pretty strange. It's not very clear what happened, but the list of potential generals starts as a large list that doesn't include all of the volunteers, but does include some people who did not volunteer. Then it changes size a bunch of times, with no real explanation, besides some mention of a meeting, and then 3 became 2, and PM's were sent. I don't mean to cause drama, but I don't even see Necro's name on the initial list, which seems strange to me since he volunteered and he has experience. Perhaps the post was edited as people were trimmed, but there's no explanation of any sort as to why some people made the list and why some didn't. Maybe I'm just being an ass, but I feel as though a bit more transparency would go a long way in resolving some of these issues.
Maybe put a description of this process in the wiki?StarfisherEcho wrote:The list starts like this:
1) Who played hard last campaign and is worth considering?
2) Who volunteered (either via the sign up sheet or verbally)?
3) Who has been around for a while that we think should be pressured into it?
It then gets narrowed like this:
1) Who actually wants to do it?
2) Who would match up well with who?
3) Verify that your top match up actually works (sometimes people change their minds)
4) Repeat
Sometimes, we never get past #1, because there's not enough people signed up.
If we get to #2 and #3, that's when you get all the meetings and the arguments and the hoohah. If we have a pool of a few people, we want to make a good match up. There's no magic wand at this stage, just a lot of talk.
There are no magic solutions. And as the saying goes, the only certain thing is death.ZombieToof wrote:
And btw. I don't think more 'competitive' thinking generals are the cure to unbalanced campaigns.