Re: bf4
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 11:51 am
maybe they got rid of itFrosteyy wrote:Im sad and a tad disappointed DICE didnt show the M16 YOLOSWAGCANNON in the presentation. They must be saving the best for last.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
maybe they got rid of itFrosteyy wrote:Im sad and a tad disappointed DICE didnt show the M16 YOLOSWAGCANNON in the presentation. They must be saving the best for last.
I actually like that... I just wonder where exactly you have to go to repair/rearm.Jokerle wrote:vehicles will have limited ammo.
I think it is a good thing. Some pause from the air-rape on some maps![]()
It actually wasn't that quick. I mean, the squad was still shooting while building began leaning, and they kept cutting the amount of time it took for them to parachute down to ground level, and then they still had a good 10-15 seconds of watching the building actually fall.elchino7 wrote: -Its a personal taste but i would love if the building didnt collapse so fast. Would love to fight on an unstable structure for some mins before it falls down.
Well there goes 25% of sales out the door.AdmiralGiggles wrote:maybe they got rid of itFrosteyy wrote:Im sad and a tad disappointed DICE didnt show the M16 YOLOSWAGCANNON in the presentation. They must be saving the best for last.
e-sports will have fun]DarkLord7854Battlelog Developer 15 points 2 hours ago
There is proper spectator, that's how we're live streaming the game on the floor this week
what are you talking about, everyone has to play metro, is not a choice!!!Tea-Assault wrote:I Some people hate metro conquest 64v, but the beauty is that you dont have to play metro if you don't want to![]()
I'd think the same thing applies in BF4
That's completely your own choice. No one said you have to destroy the building. Why would you tell your team to focus all their forces on destroying just because they capped it? Just cap it back. It's simply a choice that you have - no one is forcing it on you.Necromancer wrote:you can see the boat has 30/30 ammo, but when he shoots all the 30 rounds and reloads, it comes back to 30/30
it doesn't have any ammo limitation.
i don't see the point of the destructible flag point.
as soon as one team caps it, the other team would simply destroy the building. 99% of the game would be fighting on the rubble. so whats the point? display cool graphics?
THEN. DON'T.Necromancer wrote:then you must absolutely LOVE movies like battleship.
BIG stuff exploding on the screen.
what did you think? there won't be destructible environment in BF4? sure that building collapsing amazed me too, but now that i think about it its serves no real purpose but to show off. as it looks from the vid its outcome is inevitable.
i don't by games because they have nice graphics or cool animation.
Who said anything about stairs? And there are tons of ways to get up there, including tactical ways to avoid an ambush from a fraking elevator (unless all you think is to mindlessly run into them).Necromancer wrote:@Róka
i doubt you have stairs to get up there, would take you all game to reach the top floor once.
even if you do, and use the elevators, i can't imagine its a fair fight. the doors of the elevator opens into an ambush.
i can imagine how the doors open and - you're dead. you don't even know what hit you. fortunately we have the text at the bottom to tell us it was m320 and not the nades, RPGs, shotguns and all the other cool stuff.
if i can't take it, why would i let the other team have a free flag? imagine this is GC, wouldn't you bring it down to make it more fair? i know i would. especially if we can ruin your party up there, end your killing spree and see a giant building collapsing in the process.